Thursday, April 30, 2009
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Anna in the Middle East

Went to a presentation/book signing last night by Anna Baltzer. She's a Jewish American, a graduate from Columbia, and a Fulbright scholar--brilliant woman. Almost a decade ago, while teaching English in Turkey, she began to hear stories about the Palestinian occupation that didn't agree with the history she'd traditionally known. She spent months researching, growing increasingly unsettled as she learned more. Still incredulous, she decided to visit the occupied territories. This changed her life--and now her mission is to work, as a Jew, for peace and justice for the Palestinians. She wrote a book "Witness in Palestine" and is currently travelling throughout the US to tell "the real story."
It was such a powerful presentation, and so refreshing to hear someone non-Arab speak so passionately about the injustice and oppression of another people. I bought her book, and you can learn more at www.AnnaInTheMiddleEast.com . I HIGHLY recommend you either get her book/dvd or visit occupation101.com and get their's. They are both balanced (containing Jewish as well as Arab, American, and European contributions) and powerful stories of the injustices that have gone on far too long.
One of the things that stuck with me the most was her statement,
"We all look back at apartheid and the civil rights movement and think, 'Yeah, I would be one of those people standing up against apartheid. I would have fought for justice if I had been alive back then'. But here is what I say: these things are still happening, right now. Are you going to be complicit, or are you going to step up and work for justice?"It's so easy to revert to the "out of sight, out of mind" mentality, but there a millions around the world (in Palestine and elsewhere) who can't afford to be forgotten.
I brought four friends with me who had not previously been aware of the 'real' condition in Palestine--they all told me afterwards that it was a shocking but invaluable experience. One of my friends is actually going to study abroad in Israel this summer...she was still reeling when I left her.
"The problem isn't Islam, Christianity, or Judaism. The problem is militant Zionism. The desperation is mounting, so the acts of desperation (i.e. terrorism) will continue if we don't realize that something must change...And criticizing the state of Israel isn't anti-Semitic. What does that mean anyway? Arabs are Semites too."--Anna Balzter (Jewish American, granddaughter of a Holocaust survivor.)





This is why I want to be a journalist...to tell these stories...to know my voice was not in vain.
Visit http://www.fiveforpalestine.org . In the words of Anna--we just need to collaborate and organize. There is power in unified voices.
Thursday, April 23, 2009
Pakistan-Taliban tension (click for full story)
PESHAWAR, Pakistan – Pakistani paramilitary forces rushing to protect government buildings and bridges in a Taliban-infiltrated district just 60 miles from the capital were met with gunfire Thursday that killed one police officer, authorities said.
It was not immediately clear if the gunmen were Taliban militants, but the clash in Buner district is likely to heighten concern about the viability of a government-backed peace deal with the Taliban in northwest Pakistan.
The deal imposes Islamic law in a large segment of the country's northwest in exchange for peace with Taliban militants in the neighboring Swat Valley.
In recent days, the valley's militants have entered Buner in large numbers — establishing checkpoints, patrolling roads and spreading fear. Their movement has bolstered critics' claims that the deal would merely embolden the militants to spread their reign to other parts of the province bordering Afghanistan.
The U.S. has become one of the deal's foremost critics.
.....
Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, the Pakistan Army's chief spokesman, insisted the situation in Buner was not as dire as some have portrayed — saying militants were in control of less than 25 percent of the district, mostly its north.
"We are fully aware of the situation," Abbas said. "The other side has been informed to move these people out of this area."
Police and government officials in Buner appear to have either fled or are keeping a low profile, and there was no sign of the Frontier Constabulary forces in the town.
Two Taliban representatives declined to comment after the meeting, driving away in a pickup truck full of gun-toting associates. However, a Taliban leader who goes by the name Commander Khalil said the militants had agreed to stop patrolling in Buner, though they would still keep armed guards in their vehicles.
According to officials, the Taliban have established a base in the village of Sultanwas and set up positions in the nearby hills. Residents say they have been broadcasting sermons by radio about Islam and warning barbers to stop shaving men's beards.
Supporters say the deal takes away the militants' main rallying call for Islamic law and will let the government gradually reassert control — a theory yet to be seriously tested.
Security guards fled, and the assailants escaped before police arrived, Khan said.
-----------------------------
It was not immediately clear if the gunmen were Taliban militants, but the clash in Buner district is likely to heighten concern about the viability of a government-backed peace deal with the Taliban in northwest Pakistan.
The deal imposes Islamic law in a large segment of the country's northwest in exchange for peace with Taliban militants in the neighboring Swat Valley.
In recent days, the valley's militants have entered Buner in large numbers — establishing checkpoints, patrolling roads and spreading fear. Their movement has bolstered critics' claims that the deal would merely embolden the militants to spread their reign to other parts of the province bordering Afghanistan.
The U.S. has become one of the deal's foremost critics.
"I think the Pakistani government is basically abdicating to the Taliban and the extremists," U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told lawmakers in a hearing Wednesday in Washington. But on Thursday she added that she thought Islamabad was beginning to recognize the severity of the threat posed by militants.
.....
Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, the Pakistan Army's chief spokesman, insisted the situation in Buner was not as dire as some have portrayed — saying militants were in control of less than 25 percent of the district, mostly its north.
"We are fully aware of the situation," Abbas said. "The other side has been informed to move these people out of this area."
However, a meeting between tribal elders and the Taliban on Thursday in Daggar, Buner's main town, ended without any indication that the Taliban would withdraw.
Police and government officials in Buner appear to have either fled or are keeping a low profile, and there was no sign of the Frontier Constabulary forces in the town.
Two Taliban representatives declined to comment after the meeting, driving away in a pickup truck full of gun-toting associates. However, a Taliban leader who goes by the name Commander Khalil said the militants had agreed to stop patrolling in Buner, though they would still keep armed guards in their vehicles.
"We are here peacefully preaching for Sharia. We don't want to fight," Khalil told an AP reporter by phone.
According to officials, the Taliban have established a base in the village of Sultanwas and set up positions in the nearby hills. Residents say they have been broadcasting sermons by radio about Islam and warning barbers to stop shaving men's beards.
Supporters say the deal takes away the militants' main rallying call for Islamic law and will let the government gradually reassert control — a theory yet to be seriously tested.
Also Thursday, dozens of militants armed with guns and gasoline bombs attacked a truck terminal near Peshawar, also in northwest Pakistan, burning five tanker trucks carrying fuel to NATO troops in Afghanistan, said Abdul Khan, a local police official.
Security guards fled, and the assailants escaped before police arrived, Khan said.
-----------------------------
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Is this our 21st Century?
I spoke today with a friend of mine—a nineteen year old girl who is half-Mexican, half “white”. With bloodshot eyes, she described to me how she had been forced to break up with her boyfriend last week—simply because, after a year of dating, her mother decided it was simply “too much” to bear to have her daughter dating a black man.
I am LIVID. I can’t believe that my generation is still dealing with such chasmal ignorance and overt hatred. I won’t apologize for this woman’s mother—I won’t say that she is a helpless victim of the sociological model that she knew as a child. I can’t justify racism, no matter how you frame it.
Honestly…how is this still happening? That’s a rhetorical question—I know about the different forms of fear, insecurity, rivalry, etc that are ‘factors’ in this. But I mean, how can such trifles be blown so out of proportion to the point that they trump our universal human-ness? How does the irrational override the rational—and the spiritual?
This hurts me. I hurt for my friends, Sunshine and Marcus, who aren’t together anymore. I hurt for the older generation that remembers life before the civil rights movement. I hurt for the children today who are inheriting the injustices that should have expired long ago.
I want to write an apology to the world…but the only thing that will make any difference is if the perpetrators realize the reality of their depravity.
I am LIVID. I can’t believe that my generation is still dealing with such chasmal ignorance and overt hatred. I won’t apologize for this woman’s mother—I won’t say that she is a helpless victim of the sociological model that she knew as a child. I can’t justify racism, no matter how you frame it.
Honestly…how is this still happening? That’s a rhetorical question—I know about the different forms of fear, insecurity, rivalry, etc that are ‘factors’ in this. But I mean, how can such trifles be blown so out of proportion to the point that they trump our universal human-ness? How does the irrational override the rational—and the spiritual?
This hurts me. I hurt for my friends, Sunshine and Marcus, who aren’t together anymore. I hurt for the older generation that remembers life before the civil rights movement. I hurt for the children today who are inheriting the injustices that should have expired long ago.
I want to write an apology to the world…but the only thing that will make any difference is if the perpetrators realize the reality of their depravity.
Sunday, April 19, 2009
US boycotting anti-racism meeting at UN (click for full story)
WASHINGTON – The Obama administration will boycott "with regret" a U.N. conference on racism next week over objectionable language in the meeting's final document that could single out Israel for criticism and restrict free speech, the State Department said Saturday.
The decision follows weeks of furious internal debate and will likely please Israel and Jewish groups that lobbied against U.S. participation. But the move upset human rights advocates and some in the African-American community who had hoped that President Barack Obama, the nation's first black president, would send an official delegation.
------------------------------------------------------
Ah, politics...so limiting...such a necessary evil.
The decision follows weeks of furious internal debate and will likely please Israel and Jewish groups that lobbied against U.S. participation. But the move upset human rights advocates and some in the African-American community who had hoped that President Barack Obama, the nation's first black president, would send an official delegation.
------------------------------------------------------
Ah, politics...so limiting...such a necessary evil.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
"No One Dares Threaten Iran"
TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- The Iranian president on Saturday hailed the nation as "one of the strongest in the region" during a celebration to mark Army Day, according to the semi-official Mehr News Agency.
"Today our nation is one of the strongest in the region and a great part of the world," President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said, according to Mehr. "And no country dares to threaten it."
Ahmadinejad delivered the speech during a ceremony at the mausoleum of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic Republic, Mehr said. Khomeini led the 1979 revolution that toppled the shah of Iran and helped usher in an Islamic state. He died in 1989.
Army Day pays tribute to the nation's military and showcases its resources.
"Our army uses the most advanced equipment, which safeguards national security and because of its inherent power plays a great part as a deterrent force," Ahmadinejad said.
An aerial display of 140 planes planned for the event was canceled because of bad weather, according to Mehr
"Today our nation is one of the strongest in the region and a great part of the world," President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said, according to Mehr. "And no country dares to threaten it."
Ahmadinejad delivered the speech during a ceremony at the mausoleum of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, founder of the Islamic Republic, Mehr said. Khomeini led the 1979 revolution that toppled the shah of Iran and helped usher in an Islamic state. He died in 1989.
Army Day pays tribute to the nation's military and showcases its resources.
"Our army uses the most advanced equipment, which safeguards national security and because of its inherent power plays a great part as a deterrent force," Ahmadinejad said.
An aerial display of 140 planes planned for the event was canceled because of bad weather, according to Mehr
Friday, April 17, 2009
Pakistan Heading Toward Islamist State (click for full story)
WASHINGTON (FROM MCCLATCHY)— A growing number of U.S. intelligence, defense and diplomatic officials have concluded that there's little hope of preventing nuclear-armed Pakistan from disintegrating into fiefdoms controlled by Islamist warlords and terrorists, posing the a greater threat to the U.S. than Afghanistan's terrorist haven did before 9/11.
"It's a disaster in the making on the scale of the Iranian revolution," said a U.S. intelligence official with long experience in Pakistan who requested anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly.
Pakistan's fragmentation into warlord-run fiefdoms that host al Qaida and other terrorist groups would have grave implications for the security of its nuclear arsenal; for the U.S.-led effort to pacify Afghanistan ; and for the security of India , the nearby oil-rich Persian Gulf and Central Asia , the U.S. and its allies.
" Pakistan has 173 million people and 100 nuclear weapons, an army which is bigger than the American army, and the headquarters of al Qaida sitting in two-thirds of the country which the government does not control," said David Kilcullen , a retired Australian army officer, a former State Department adviser and a counterinsurgency consultant to the Obama administration.
" Pakistan isn't Afghanistan , a backward, isolated, landlocked place that outsiders get interested in about once a century," agreed the U.S. intelligence official. "It's a developed state . . . (with) a major Indian Ocean port and ties to the outside world, especially the (Persian) Gulf, that Afghanistan and the Taliban never had."
"It's a disaster in the making on the scale of the Iranian revolution," said a U.S. intelligence official with long experience in Pakistan who requested anonymity because he wasn't authorized to speak publicly.
Pakistan's fragmentation into warlord-run fiefdoms that host al Qaida and other terrorist groups would have grave implications for the security of its nuclear arsenal; for the U.S.-led effort to pacify Afghanistan ; and for the security of India , the nearby oil-rich Persian Gulf and Central Asia , the U.S. and its allies.
" Pakistan has 173 million people and 100 nuclear weapons, an army which is bigger than the American army, and the headquarters of al Qaida sitting in two-thirds of the country which the government does not control," said David Kilcullen , a retired Australian army officer, a former State Department adviser and a counterinsurgency consultant to the Obama administration.
" Pakistan isn't Afghanistan , a backward, isolated, landlocked place that outsiders get interested in about once a century," agreed the U.S. intelligence official. "It's a developed state . . . (with) a major Indian Ocean port and ties to the outside world, especially the (Persian) Gulf, that Afghanistan and the Taliban never had."
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Changing the game with Iran? (Click for full story...)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- One of the main stumbling blocks to talk with Iran has been the condition that Iran suspends its uranium enrichment. Now, the Obama administration may take that option off the table, at least for now.
Iran maintains enriching uranium for nuclear energy is its right. Now the West seems to have come around to Iran's way of thinking. Last week during a speech on proliferation in Prague, Czech Republic, President Obama admitted as much when he said, "We will support Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy with rigorous inspections."
The International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, has long argued to allow Iran to maintain a small face-saving nuclear enrichment program under the guise of "research and development."
Allowing such a program under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, at least while negotiations continue, would involve strict IAEA inspections -- something which may give the international community the kind of insight into Iran's nuclear program which it has long sought.
However, moving beyond the issue of enrichment helps Obama inch closer toward engagement with Iran, something he promised during the campaign and has begun to undertake with small, albeit significant, steps, most noticeably his New Year's message to the Iranian people.
Those who watch Iran closely say Obama's outreach is being warmly received in the region. While the response from spiritual leader Ayatollah Khamanei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad seems vague at first glance, experts argue the regime is being quite conciliatory, even flirting with the U.S. overtures and opening the door for talks.
The United States and its European allies, which have just invited Iran to a fresh round of nuclear talks, are coming to the realization that if Iran's nuclear program isn't quite at the point of no return, it will be soon.With 5,500 centrifuges, roughly enough for about two weapons worth of uranium a year, Iran isn't going to just shut down its enrichment facility as a goodwill gesture.
For years, Iran has been willing to endure sanctions and economic isolation. What it hasn't been willing to do is suspend enrichment.
Iran maintains enriching uranium for nuclear energy is its right. Now the West seems to have come around to Iran's way of thinking. Last week during a speech on proliferation in Prague, Czech Republic, President Obama admitted as much when he said, "We will support Iran's right to peaceful nuclear energy with rigorous inspections."
The International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, has long argued to allow Iran to maintain a small face-saving nuclear enrichment program under the guise of "research and development."
Allowing such a program under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, at least while negotiations continue, would involve strict IAEA inspections -- something which may give the international community the kind of insight into Iran's nuclear program which it has long sought.
If adopted, the new strategy will undoubtedly be condemned by Israel, which has warned the U.S. that it has until the end of the year to put an end to Iran's uranium production before it takes matters into its own hands.
However, moving beyond the issue of enrichment helps Obama inch closer toward engagement with Iran, something he promised during the campaign and has begun to undertake with small, albeit significant, steps, most noticeably his New Year's message to the Iranian people.
Those who watch Iran closely say Obama's outreach is being warmly received in the region. While the response from spiritual leader Ayatollah Khamanei and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad seems vague at first glance, experts argue the regime is being quite conciliatory, even flirting with the U.S. overtures and opening the door for talks.
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
North Korea: "Asia's Crazy Uncle" (click for full story)
SEOUL, South Korea – North Korea vowed Tuesday to restart its nuclear reactor and to boycott international disarmament talks for good in retaliation for the U.N. Security Council's condemnation of its rocket launch.
Russia, voicing regret over the move, urged Pyongyang to return to the negotiating table. The Foreign Ministry called the U.N. statement "legitimate and well-balanced," and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said all sides must stick to the current disarmament process. China, the North's main ally, appealed for calm.
In Washington, a senior U.S. official called the decision "unfortunate."
"It will further isolate the North from the rest of the international community, and the North will have to deal with that," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
North Korea's denunciation of the council's "hostile" move came just hours after all 15 members, including Beijing and Moscow, unanimously agreed to condemn the April 5 launch as a violation of U.N. resolutions and to tighten sanctions against the regime.
Russia, voicing regret over the move, urged Pyongyang to return to the negotiating table. The Foreign Ministry called the U.N. statement "legitimate and well-balanced," and Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said all sides must stick to the current disarmament process. China, the North's main ally, appealed for calm.
In Washington, a senior U.S. official called the decision "unfortunate."
"It will further isolate the North from the rest of the international community, and the North will have to deal with that," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
North Korea's denunciation of the council's "hostile" move came just hours after all 15 members, including Beijing and Moscow, unanimously agreed to condemn the April 5 launch as a violation of U.N. resolutions and to tighten sanctions against the regime.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Slightly Softer Tone Towards Cuba (click for full story)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Obama lifted all restrictions Monday on the ability of individuals to visit relatives in Cuba, as well as to send them remittances.
The changes in Cuban policy was unveiled before President Obama's trip to the Summit of the Americas.
The move represents a significant shift in a U.S. policy that had remained largely unchanged for nearly half a century. It comes days before Obama leaves for a key meeting of hemispheric powers, the Summit of the Americas, in Trinidad and Tobago.
"President Obama has directed that a series of steps be taken to reach out to the Cuban people to support their desire to enjoy basic human rights and to freely determine their country's future," White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said.
Obama also ordered new steps to promote the "freer flow of information among the Cuban people and between those in Cuba and the rest of the world, as well as to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian items directly to the Cuban people," Gibbs added.
The president took "these steps [in part] to help bridge the gap among divided Cuban families."
Obama believes that the change in U.S. policy will ultimately help bring about a more tolerant, democratic Cuban government, noted White House Latin American policy adviser Dan Restrepo.
He thinks "that creating independence, creating space for the Cuban people to operate freely from the regime is the kind of space they need to start the process toward a more democratic Cuba," Restrepo said.
So..."a U.S. policy that had remained largely unchanged for nearly half a century." Hmmm. Without analyzing the pros and cons of this policy change (which I happen to support), I would argue that it's probably a good idea to bring up these sort of things every half a century or so. ;)
The changes in Cuban policy was unveiled before President Obama's trip to the Summit of the Americas.
The move represents a significant shift in a U.S. policy that had remained largely unchanged for nearly half a century. It comes days before Obama leaves for a key meeting of hemispheric powers, the Summit of the Americas, in Trinidad and Tobago.
"President Obama has directed that a series of steps be taken to reach out to the Cuban people to support their desire to enjoy basic human rights and to freely determine their country's future," White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said.
Obama also ordered new steps to promote the "freer flow of information among the Cuban people and between those in Cuba and the rest of the world, as well as to facilitate the delivery of humanitarian items directly to the Cuban people," Gibbs added.
The president took "these steps [in part] to help bridge the gap among divided Cuban families."
Obama believes that the change in U.S. policy will ultimately help bring about a more tolerant, democratic Cuban government, noted White House Latin American policy adviser Dan Restrepo.
He thinks "that creating independence, creating space for the Cuban people to operate freely from the regime is the kind of space they need to start the process toward a more democratic Cuba," Restrepo said.
So..."a U.S. policy that had remained largely unchanged for nearly half a century." Hmmm. Without analyzing the pros and cons of this policy change (which I happen to support), I would argue that it's probably a good idea to bring up these sort of things every half a century or so. ;)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)